Search made information accessible. Guidance will make participation universal. If the web is going to work for everyone, navigation must evolve from finding pages to finishing goals.

Access is not participation

Traditional browsing assumes users can craft queries, compare sources, and manage multi-step tasks inside tabs. Large groups cannot or will not do that for everyday goals. Evidence is clear. One third of U.S. workers lack foundational digital skills even as 92 percent of jobs require them (National Skills Coalition). More than one in four U.S. adults live with a disability that can affect cognition, vision, hearing, or mobility (CDC). Fifteen percent of adults are smartphone-only internet users, which constrains complex browsing (Pew Research). And the web itself has a documented “messy middle” where abundant information blocks progress rather than enabling it (Google Research).

The browser is not natural for everyone.

‍

Many adults operate at low levels of digital problem solving, the skill PIAAC measures as “problem solving in technology-rich environments” (NCES Fast Facts). Voice use keeps rising and is already mainstream, with a majority of Americans using voice assistants on some device (NPR and Edison). Text and phone are still the most comfortable channels for many people.

From fishing for answers to being guided through goals

Search excels at atomic lookups. Life is not atomic. Consider a real world case: pet ownership. The question “what pet food should I buy” is not a destination. The destination is responsible ownership. That journey includes breed fit, adoption logistics, vet care, vaccination schedule, training, food, insurance, time budgeting, and community resources. 

It branches. It changes with context. Answer summaries flatten that nuance. Navigation should amplify it.

Maya’s journey: two paths to the same goal

Persona: Maya lives in an apartment, works variable shifts, and wants to adopt a rescue dog in the next 30 days.

Path A: Search or AEO style answer

• Queries: “best dog breeds for apartments”, “adopt near me”, “best kibble for allergies”.
• Tabs and toggles: listicles, affiliate blogs, Reddit threads, vet sites, shelter forms.
• Friction: repetition, conflicting reviews, time cost, storage questions, building policies.
• Outcome: a decent food brand and a bookmarked shelter, no integrated plan.

Path B: An AI helper that navigates like a skilly guide

• Starts with: “I want to adopt a rescue dog. I work nights. Help me plan it.”
• The guide asks constraints, checks building rules, suggests compatible breeds, and creates a 30-day plan.
• Agent-to-agent handoffs: adoption logistics, local vet onboarding, training group, food selection based on allergies and delivery constraints.
• Channels: the same guide works by web, SMS, or a phone call, like a trusted friend on demand.
• Outcome: adoption booked, first vet visit scheduled, starter kit ordered, training sessions on the calendar, ongoing reminders.

Navigation as a value equation

Discovery matters, but value only materializes when people complete journeys. A simple way to think about it:

Navigation Value Formula

Internet value created = Discoverability × Navigability × Accessibility

Search lifted discoverability. Guides lift navigability and accessibility at the same time.

Consumer math: why guidance changes outcomes

Every digital journey has drop-offs… the quiet moments where people give up because it’s too confusing, too fragmented, or too repetitive. Think of a six-step process like defining a need, comparing options, picking a plan, buying, scheduling, and following up.

In a search-driven world, roughly 40 percent of people drop off at each step. Multiply that over six stages and only about five out of every hundred reach the finish line. When guided by an intelligent agent, that drop rate can fall to about 15 percent per step. That means nearly four in ten people complete the same journey.

In plain English: guidance turns lost intent into finished outcomes — roughly eight times more completions without increasing demand. That’s what inclusion looks like when it’s measurable.

Business math: why navigation expands the pie

Now look at it from the supply side. Imagine a small pet retailer and a nearby veterinarian. Each month, about a thousand people in their area start searching online about “getting a new pet.” In the old model, maybe 30 percent of them find the retailer’s site or walk into the store. Of those, perhaps 2.5 percent actually buy so about 75 new customers.

With a guide in the loop, those same thousand intents don’t just click around, they get routed directly into the retailer’s workflow. Sixty percent reach the store or site, and because the guide qualifies them with personalized plans and ready carts, about 7.5 percent buy. That’s 450 completed purchases from the same demand.

And it doesn’t stop there. A guide can hand off a new dog owner to a trusted local vet or trainer with context intact — the breed, the schedule, the goals. Search can’t do that. Guides can.

Same market. Same interest. Radically higher completion and shared value for the community. Navigation doesn’t just make the web easier — it redistributes opportunity.

Why this is inclusive by design

• Channel fit: guides meet people where they are. Web, SMS, or voice. Majority voice use is already the norm on devices (NPR and Edison).
• Cognitive load: the guide remembers context, avoids repetitive forms, and breaks tasks into steps. That helps users with low digital skills documented by PIAAC and workers identified in the NSC report.
• Device reality: smartphone-only users can complete complex journeys without desktop heavy lifting (Pew).

What guides actually do that search cannot

• Plan, not just answer: multi-step goal setting with reminders and sequencing.
• Agent-to-agent referrals: warm handoffs. A pet adoption agent hands to a food agent, then a vet agent, then a training agent. Context persists.
• Preference memory: budget, allergies, storage limits, building policy, commute. The plan updates when life changes and not just how you used to have the conversation.
• Local lift: guides surface the long tail. The independent pet shop and the neighborhood trainer get recommended when they actually fit the job.

Navigation, not just answers, is the economic unlock

Search will continue to serve confident researchers. The Internet’s next gains come from the people left behind by tab hunting and the small businesses buried by it. The path forward is not another list of links. It is a guide that finishes the job.

Build the navigation layer now

• For platforms and cities: stand up entry guides that route by intent. A parent who says “help me adopt” should get a plan, then referrals that fit their neighborhood.
• For retailers and service providers: publish AEO-ready facts as table stakes, then launch a goal-oriented agent that can be texted or called. Measure completed journeys, not sessions.
• For nonprofits and educators: treat guides as digital accessibility. Replace complex forms with conversational intake. Track outcomes.

Search finds. Guides finish. If we care about participation, inclusion, and growth, the Internet needs a navigation revolution.

‍